ad

Laws: Target high earners in Budget

Former chief secretary to the Treasury urges chancellor George Osborne to raise income tax threshold to £10,000 in next month's Budget

david laws

DAVID LAWS, the former chief secretary to the Treasury, has increased pressure on the chancellor George Osborne to raise the income tax threshold to £10,000 in next month's Budget, saying it was time to signal the end of austerity on household budgets.

Laws told BBC's Newsnight yesterday that the Liberal Democrats would fund the move - which would cost the Treasury some £9bn - by halving the higher rate of tax relief on pensions from 40% to 20%, City AM reported.

The Lib Dems would target the top five per cent of earners, which equates to those earning around £60,000 and above, he said.

Laws, a close aide to Nick Clegg, said high earners had done too well out of the tax system, arguing that all of the tax relief has gone to the very most affluent people in society.

"We can make changes that take away some of the subsidies that are going to the top one per cent or five per cent of the income distribution and get them to where they're really needed - those on low and middle incomes", he said.

Laws said increasing the income tax threshold would give the government the chance "of ending the austerity on household budgets."

Visitor comments

The subsidised rich.

I admire Mr Laws use of the word 'subsidies'. It's a great concept - no more taxation - just assume that the state owns everything and allocate subsidies to the deserving serfs. Someone earning up to £10k could be 100% subsidised by allowing them to retain all their earnings while the undeserving rich would get a smaller subsidy, possibly 20 or 30%. Well done.

Posted by JohnB, 21 Feb 2012

call me a pessimist but...

... as we are still racking up national debt despite the Con-Dem austerity measures, surely the better move would be:

- to keep the income tax threshold at £10,000 and save the £9bn.

- to deploy any and all measures - such as those mentioned by Laws - which will reduce the speed at which we incur debt, with a view to eventually repaying the deficit ahead of deadlines, but with a sensitivity to the 'brain drain' effect of underpaying and overtaxing Britain's most intelligent, skilled and valuable workers...?

High pay is given primarily to retain talent, and when a state penalises the top earning 5% (or even 1%) alone, surely it runs the risk of losing its talent?

Posted by teachmeyourways, 21 Feb 2012

 

advertisement

advertisement

advertisement

Senior financial appointments brought to you by

accountancyagejobs logo

Latest opportunities:

Information currently unavailable

Find appointments

Search by job title, salary, or location - we only list senior financial roles