ad

Companies failing to forecast mid-term cashflow and sales

25 Aug 2009

By Melanie Stern

Most companies will fail to accurately forecast cashflow over the next three months because they still rely on spreadsheets and don’t utilise communication links with business units, suppliers or customers to get a sense of their financial position.

Research from finance function adviser The Hackett Group, conducted in association with the US National Association of Corporate Treasurers ­ taking a sample of 85 US and European companies with revenue of $14bn or more ­ found only 22% can forecast operating cashflow two to three months out to within 5% accuracy. Less than half can make the same claim about their sales forecasting, the study found.

Hackett Group added that it saw better cashflow forecasting among companies at the top quartile by revenue, noting a common style of cross-functional teams with significant operational involvement ­ “critical given the number of groups outside of finance that have a role in the forecasting process.”

This drove better forecasting results by fostering closer relationships with clients and suppliers to understand their financial positions and keep regular tabs on their credit positions. It added that the more successful cashflow forecasting businesses have more structured and interactive dispute resolution processes for customers and suppliers.

The study also revealed that 80% of companies don’t set forecasting accuracy targets and 85% do not have any form of incentive to promote improved forecasting accuracy.

To see how other FDs leverage working capital, click here.

Visitor comments

eProcurement offers spend control and more accurate forecasting

For a financial director in the current economic climate, cash is priority number one and the stability of their business will depend on their ability to forecast the business cash requirements 8-12 weeks in advance.

Previously, in a growth market, businesses have been slow to replace manual purchase ordering processes with a software-based alternative that offers full commitment accounting, centralised control over the corporate budget and more accurate forecasting of the business cash requirements.

Now, there is greater need for eProcurement and the control and accurate forecasting that this can bring. In response to growing demand for a software-based and largely automated process, eProcurement has entered the mass market and is now within the reach of more financial directors, irrespective of the size of their organisation, the financial systems that they operate, the unique requirements of the business or budget.

eProcurement puts control back into the hands of the financial director, requiring every department and every member of staff to utilise an automated purchase ordering process. The business can stipulate purchase ordering requirements such as who should be asked for authorisation in any given situation, and preferred supplier lists to honour preferred supplier arrangements and to ensure best value.

More importantly, requests outside of the budget can be committed to or denied based on knowledge of every commitment that has been made or is pending on the system, at that time. With eProcurement, financial directors really do have full spend control, and the business can make decisions based on real figures and accurate forecasts, never again to be surprised by an unsuspected invoice.

Neil Robertson

CEO

Compleat Software

http://www.compleatsoftware.com

Posted by Neil Robertson, 28 Aug 2009

 

advertisement

advertisement

advertisement

Senior financial appointments brought to you by

accountancyagejobs logo

Latest opportunities:

Find appointments

Search by job title, salary, or location - we only list senior financial roles