19 Nov 2003
By AccountancyAge.com
The product, know as 'Blips' did not satisfy tax rules, according to Mark Watson, a former partner in the firm's Washington office. He claimed there was no economic substance behind their complex transactions, the Financial Times reported.
The accusations were made to a congressional panel yesterday, which was told that Blips generated over £1bn (£591m) in unlawful tax benefits for KPMG clients in less than a year.
advertisement
Have similiar articles delivered to your email box
advertisement
Email Newsletters
Email Newsletters
Please enter your email below to receive your profile link
advertisement
Search by job title, salary, or location - we only list senior financial roles
The Financial Director Summit 2012 will provide a unique platform in which to share, compare and contrast experiences whilst learning and networking with peers
Our experts provide practical solutions to a number of challenges associated with successful cash management
David Cameron’s veto of the EU Treaty has been hailed as protecting UK business, but will frosty relationships with the EU harm trade, asks Neil Hodge...