THE US PHARMACEUTICAL seeking to acquire UK rival AstraZeneca represents a tax avoidance risk, according to the UK druggist's chief executive Pascal Soriot.
Pfizer, which has proposed a £63bn takeover of the UK business, intends to use the AstraZeneca deal to relocate its tax base to the UK in a move designed to see it unfettered by the US 35% corporation tax rate and take advantage of Britain's kinder 20% levy.
Soriot told The Guardian: "The risk is that if it turns into a controversy our own company would be impacted by it. Even if we were to agree a [takeover] deal, it takes eight to ten months to close it.
"If this controversy leads to a delay, you have to remember the shareholders of Pfizer can still vote no. Imagine we go through this entire process of waiting, a lot of anxiety in our employees' minds, lots of distraction, potential controversy surrounding us and in the end the deal doesn't happen and we are left flailing in the wind."
Soriot also hit back at Pfizer's pledge to ringfence work on important medicines and criticised the US group's plan to split the combined business into three separate divisions.
"It's all very well to say we will ringfence, but what does it mean, ‘ringfencing'? You have to understand precisely how you would do that. The model where you would split the company in three pieces I don't think would work at all for our business."
Sign up for Financial Director email alerts
Please enter your email below to receive your profile link
Search by job title, salary, or location - we only list senior financial roles
Our panel of experts explore the major pension pain points and discuss what actions finance professionals should be taking in order to alleviate them
The first CFO Agenda, hosted by Financial Director at the Royal Society of Arts, was a roaring success
Corporate failures can almost always be traced back to a failure of corporate culture. But how do you assess culture? asks Richard Crump
Send to a friend