Strategy & Operations » Leadership & Management » CFO at Unilever on leadership through a crisis

CFO at Unilever on leadership through a crisis

Gavin van Boekel, the former CFO of Food Solutions at Unilever, discusses the challenges and decisions he faced as a leader of one of the most impacted sectors of the consumer goods giant.

Gavin van Boekel is now CFO of Middle Europe for Unilever, looking after the Benelux, DACH, Italy and Nordics regions. Before moving to this role in September 2020, Gavin was CFO of Food Solutions, the global B2B foods and refreshment business arm of Unilever, and one of the hardest hit during the pandemic.

In this case study, Gavin tells us about some of the key decisions and challenges he faced as a leader of such a severely impacted industry, and the importance of encouraging his team to think creatively to continue business in a year of uncertainty and struggle.

 

The Food Solutions division was the hardest hit by the pandemic. How did this affect Unilever and what were some of the key challenges? 

When the pandemic hit in March 2020, we saw an almost immediate closure of the hospitality, travel and tourism industries worldwide. As the Food Solutions division of Unilever, we operate largely within the hospitality industry, so many of our customers – restaurant, bar and café owners – were forced to shut their doors to customers.

This presented two main challenges for us. Firstly, we understandably experienced a significant loss in revenue. Food Solutions always made a healthy profit in the years before the pandemic and suddenly we had to handle a new situation where we were losing the same amount in profit per month. This, combined with the vast majority of our customers being closed, meant that we had to deal with a large loss in revenue from March 2020 well into 2021.

Secondly, we were no longer able to rely on conducting business the way we have always done. As a global organisation, we have sales reps placed around the world who were accustomed to visiting customers in-person. However, as different countries experienced lockdowns and restrictions on travel were enforced, we were no longer able to safely send our people to our customers. We had to rethink our approach in order to drive business, preserve client relationships and also act responsibly towards our people given the information we had at the time.

 

What steps did you take to rise to the challenge and improve the situation? 

Our number one priority was ensuring our people were safe and could continue to do their work within local restrictions. With thousands of sales reps usually visiting customers in their kitchen or on their premises, we needed to think creatively in order to continue communication effectively and maintain our long-standing customer relationships.

This meant finding ways to adapt and offer our people safer ways of working. To do this, we implemented two models across our different markets. Firstly, where we could, we worked with our IT function to connect people remotely and leverage video functions such as Teams, Zoom and FaceTime. Secondly, while technology is largely available in most of our markets, in some remote areas such as in South America, it is still a challenge. In this situation, we continued in-person meetings but we ensured our sales reps were safe by supporting them to take Uber instead of public transport, as well as maintain social distance when with our customers.

We also needed to think creatively on how to work with Zoom and other virtual communication platforms. Not only did we need to preserve customer relationships, but the nature of the work usually relied on in-person interaction too e.g. trying different sauces, experimenting with flavours in the kitchen to create the best dish. Continuing this virtually was difficult, and in some cases, Unilever supported sales reps to use services such as Uber to send over goods such as sauces and spices, which they would then discuss with chefs over video or on the phone when it arrived.

Care for our customers was also a key priority for us. Many of our customers are small business owners whose revenues very quickly dried up during the pandemic and who had limited financial resources to fall back on. For most, their fixed costs also remained the same and so we unfortunately saw a lot of customers close their businesses last year.

However, the takeaway industry boomed in 2020 and it was obvious that this was a crucial avenue to make money. For our customers, we offered tips on how to transition from inside dining to takeaway, ensuring their recipes could withstand travel. We also advised our customers on recipes and ingredients that would help them manage waste stemming from the larger fluctuations/uncertainty in demand. As consumer behaviour had changed so dramatically, they needed to align their orders as well as their dishes with what they expected to sell. 

As a business, we also needed to explore other avenues to try to make up for the decline in our revenue in existing markets. As such, we worked to explore whether sectors that were still open, such as hospitals and schools, were a viable option. This proved to be successful, as students were staying at boarding schools for safety and hospitals were at capacity which meant that food demand increased. Unilever Food Solutions was in a position to supply for this increased need, and it was a great example of our team coming together to think creatively and strategically about how to move forward. 

In the end this accomplished three key goals. Firstly we were able to help customers in need to cater for increased demand with solutions and products. This was particularly important as in some markets supply chains, availability of produce was getting scarce. Secondly, it provided much needed new revenue streams for Unilever Food Solutions. Thirdly, it strengthened customer relationships which is something we are still benefiting from today.

Regarding internal decisions for our employees, when the pandemic hit in March 2020, Unilever decided not to let go of our employees until at least the end of Q2. This was because we didn’t feel it was appropriate to send off our people without any salaries or support in such a difficult time. After Q2, as the pandemic continued and we got a clearer picture of our revenue decline, we made the tough decision to let go of some of our third-party workers to curtail our fixed costs. That said, I am proud we could continue to give our people the certainty of employment and hence an income for them and their families.

 

What was the value/benefit of some of your decisions? 

During my MBA we were taught crisis management. On one occasion, our lecturer was late and we were chatting amongst ourselves. Suddenly, the door swung open and a doctor who just came from the ER walked in. He explained that there is no greater crisis than a human who is about to lose their life, and that the key job in the ER was to prevent the patients from dying, not from making the patient better. He explained that these are distinctly different approaches.

I think this is an important approach for any leader and one I try to practice myself. When the pandemic hit the business, I agreed with my CEO that our first and foremost priority was to protect our people, care for our customers and ensure the viability of the business. All other things came secondary.

This gave us the clarity and prioritisation that really guided us through the initial stages of the pandemic and made us focus on what was important. We were also incredibly lucky to be a part of a bigger organisation like Unilever during the pandemic that, despite our revenue loss, supported all of our decisions. Although my unit in B2B was suffering, Unilever was doing well as lockdowns meant people weren’t dining outside but instead were eating and cooking at home using different – but still Unilever – products. So in the end we were actually quite a balanced company. 

I think one permanent benefit from the pandemic is the power of technology to connect people and empower business. It was also heavily discussed at Unilever for some time before the pandemic as a potential option to reduce costs and expand our network. However, as a business who relied on collaboration and connection, we thought it couldn’t work. But because the pandemic ultimately forced us all to explore that virtual avenue, it has actually been really successful and something I think will now change the way we work moving forward.

 

What was the outcome?

As a CFO, my main focus was to find avenues to reduce costs significantly – through people working differently backed by technology – as well as define new revenue options, such as leveraging the takeaway industry. I think we did this successfully and now, the Food Solutions division is in a better place to move forward.

Once we knew Food Solutions was in a position to weather the storm, I was clear to pass the baton to my successor. In September 2020, I moved from CFO of Food Solutions to CFO of Middle Europe. 

At the time, and still today, all employees at Unilever are still working from home. It is bizarre for everyone, but particularly leaders, to start a role completely remote and not be able to meet your new team to connect. Without spontaneous, in-person interactions, it is difficult to get a sense of what is really going on and fulfill my role of setting up people to do their best.

We are planning agendas through Teams and although not ideal, I’m looking forward to meeting my team when we are safe to do so and continue to be a successful leader in what is still very uncertain times.

 

What are your key learnings? Is there anything you would have done differently?

I had a number of key learnings as CFO of the Food Solutions division at Unilever. Firstly, as a leader, I was too lenient and forgiving in the speed of change and implementation. As a business that was always doing well and had a healthy profit pre-pandemic, the need for change was not the biggest priority. Although I wanted to change the business model, I didn’t push hard enough to find any inroads pre-Covid, which put us in a reactive rather than proactive position when the pandemic hit in March 2020. The impetus to change should have been clearer earlier, and that will be a key experience that I will take forward for myself as a CFO. 

Secondly, I think now more than ever it is important to encourage and cultivate a positive, growth mindset within your team, stimulating creative thinking. As so many of our avenues shut down during the pandemic, it was great to see the team come together to explore different opportunities, and alongside remote working and navigating a new way of collaborating, I thought we did this very well.

Thirdly, the pandemic has highlighted how important it is for a finance leader to be adaptable, resilient and what I like to call a T-shaped professional. This is where the leg of the ‘T’ is still the core of what makes us great as financial experts e.g. financial accounting, controls, process knowledge/optimisation etc, however to succeed in the future we now need to broaden our experience and skillset. We must gain an understanding of other functions and end-to-end business processes, rather than being – as we have been historically – solely focused on our own function. This move to a more rounded individual will ensure we are the future-fit sparring partner to the business.

Share
Was this article helpful?

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to get your daily business insights