It’s always a dangerous game when journalists start criticising the so-called typographical mistakes made by others, but we can’t let the Inland Revenue off the hook so easily.
Last year, Hector’s people issued a brief Tax Bulletin, all about the PAYE anti-avoidance provisions of the new Finance Act. But a page of amendments dispatched shortly after lists no fewer than 24 errors in the 12-page document.
Some, admittedly, are minor. Dates, however, are important in the tax world – just try filling in your self-assessment form on 1 February. Yet the errors include quite a few cases of “xx August” to be replaced with “31 July”, or “20 October” in place of “27 October”. The Revenue blamed “a computer error” (aka, human error with a computer) as a result of which the final version of the document was not saved before being sent to the printers. The good ol’ Revenue reprinted the whole thing.
Join Financial Director & Concur for this FREE web seminar on how to combat internal expense fraud
Finance, as a function, continues to struggle to find its place, define its function, and become the dynamic enabler it should be
The IoT represents a potentially game changing breakthrough. Targeted small scale investment could change the way your business works forever, finds Christian Doherty
A lawsuit has been filed against Oracle over claims it used improper accounting methods to inflate its cloud computing revenues